Image attribution: Harisingh at the English-language Wikipedia
A tall, lean Amrit-dhaari (baptised) Sikh, a milkman, rides his motorcycle into our apartment complex every day around noon. He wears a saffron-coloured turban on his head and a saffron scarf around his neck. He has a flowing white beard and carries a small kirpan (ceremonial dagger) attached to a cloth strap worn over his right shoulder. All in all, he seems to be inclined deeply towards religion.
He parks his bike at a spot visible from our drawing room (or living room) window. He then brings out a measuring vessel and a bottle of water and measures and adds copious amounts of water and milk from the bottle and a large can (loaded on his motorcycle), respectively, to smaller cans. He then delivers the mixture in the smaller cans to his customers living in various flats in our building, a practice that is not only unethical but also illegal.
Milk adulteration is punishable under Indian law with imprisonment of up to six months, and Sikhism also advocates against it. Guru Nanak Dev says, “Truth is the highest of all, but higher still is truthful living.”
It is a stark contrast -- the milkman, who has adopted an outwardly religious appearance and probably follows rituals such as saying his prayers regularly, seems to care scarcely about the essence of his religion or the law of the land.
When I spoke about the milkman to a childhood friend, who also happens to be an Amrit-dhaari Sikh, he tried to underplay the offence the milkman commits daily. At first, he told me a joke about city folk falling ill if given pure milk to drink, accustomed as they have become to drinking adulterated milk. When that did not cut any ice with me, he tried to justify the milkman's actions by saying that everything had become so expensive and the milkman needed to mix water with milk to make a handsome profit.
Now, it so happens that the childhood friend is a businessman and probably does not pay his taxes honestly, among other illegal practices adopted to increase his earnings. So, he seems to have felt obliged to defend the actions of someone in a similar situation concerning the law and his religion.
The essence of religion, beyond the rituals, is certainly not everyone's cup of tea.